0
Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

ÀÓ»ó°£È£»çÀÇ Á÷¹« ½ºÆ®·¹½º¿Í Á÷¹«¸¸Á·µµ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ »çȸÀû ÁöÁöÀÇ ÀúÀýÈ¿°ú

The Moderating Effects of Social Support between Job Stress and Job Satisfaction in Staff Nurses

»ê¾÷°£È£ÇÐȸÁö 2005³â 14±Ç 2È£ p.108 ~ 117
KMID : 0384920050140020108
±èÁ¤Èñ ( Kim Jeong-Hee ) - Á¦ÁÖ´ëÇб³ ÀÇÇÐÀü¹®´ëÇпø °£È£Çаú

Çö¹Ì¿­ ( Hyun Mi-Yeul ) - Á¦ÁÖ´ëÇб³ ÀÇÇÐÀü¹®´ëÇпø °£È£Çаú

Abstract

Purpose: This paper was attempted to focused on the analysis of job stress and job satisfaction according to the moderating effects of social support.

Method: Data collected from 302 staff nurses in 2 general hospitals, with self-reporting questionnaires( Wolfgang¡¯s HPSI, modified Hagihara¡¯s social support, and MSQ). Descriptive statistics, Cronbach¡¯s alpha, Pearson correlation, ANOVA, and moderated regression analysis were used.

Result: The subjects exhibited significantly highest level of ¡¯the work and patients¡¯ conditions¡¯. The perceived job stress was negatively correlated with supervisor and co-workers¡¯ support, and job satisfactions. Also supervisor and coworkers¡¯ support were positively correlated with job satisfactions. The main factor that affected the job satisfactions was ¡¯work and patient conditions¡¯ and it was explained 35.5% out of the total variance of the job satisfactions with ¡¯the work load and disturbing factor¡¯, ¡¯supervisor support¡¯ and ¡¯co-workers¡¯ support¡¯. Supervisor support moderated the relationships between ¡¯the patient care responsibilities and career development factor¡¯ and satisfaction.

Conclusion: For developing the stress management program for hospital nurses, ¡¯the work and patients¡¯ conditions¡¯, and the strategies of strengthening ¡¯supervisor and co-workers¡¯ support¡¯ should be considered. In addition to, it may be considered to examine the effects of social support on the other criterion variables.
KeyWords
Á÷¹«½ºÆ®·¹½º, »çȸÀûÁöÁö, Á÷¹«¸¸Á·µµ, °£È£»ç
Stress, Social support, Job satisfaction, Nurses
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI)